📄 Notable* Recent AI/ML arXiv Papers

Last updated just now...

📄 Semantic Representation for Agentic Self-Play in Automated Laboratories
🗓️ Published: 10/23/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32755v1
👥 Authors: Yves Delley, John Coller, Zachary Cutts, Alexander Daryin, Mathias Bellaiche, Jun W. Kim, Oscar Donosa, Srinidhi B. Seshadri, Tanner Clary, Sandy Klemm, Avinatan Hassidim (possible past Google (United States) affiliation), Yossi Matias (possible past Google (United States) affiliation), Pooja Rao, Petar Sirkovic, Annalisa Pawlosky (possible past Google (United States) affiliation)
Abstract

Navigating complex, high-dimensional biological search spaces necessitates scalable physical and computational intelligence to explore beyond local optima through iterative self-play across ideation, experimentation, and automation. Translating experimental designs into reliable physical execution remains bottlenecked by static laboratory automation and unmodeled physical variability. To address this, we introduce VERified Infrastructure for Discovery Laboratories, or VERID, a foundational infra...

📄 When Agents Fail: Model or Harness--Who's to Blame?
🗓️ Published: 10/23/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32483v1
👥 Authors: Shao Zhang, Hangfan Zhang, Yuanyuan Shi, Hao Li (possible past Tsinghua University affiliation), Min-Le Su, Kangcong Li, Jingping Wang, Chunjiang Mu, Chen Zhang (possible past Peking University affiliation), Yang Chen (possible past Tencent (China) affiliation), Bo Zhang (possible past Tencent (China) affiliation), Shuyue Hu
Abstract

LLM agents combine models with execution harnesses, so agentic benchmark performance reflects their joint behavior. We argue that harnesses should therefore be evaluated through their interactions with underlying models. We develop a framework combining five complementary measures: (i) Valid Completion Rate (VCR), how reliably agents finish normally and deliver evaluable results, irrespective of task correctness; (ii) Model-Harness Fit, how well a harness supports task achievement through valid ...

📄 RxnExBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Structured Chemical Reaction Extraction from Scientific Literature
🗓️ Published: 10/23/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32221v1
👥 Authors: Jiaxing Sun, Junyuan Gao, Ruikang Zhang, Hao Zheng, Lingli Ge, Xiao An, Jiang Wu, Huazheng Zeng, Jiahe Song, Chen Zhu (possible past Baidu (China) affiliation), Haote Yang, Jingchao Wang, Lu Chen, Yuanyuan Cao, Ruijie Zhang, Shengxin Lu, Weijia Li (possible past Tsinghua University affiliation), Lijun Wu, Conghui He (possible past Tsinghua University affiliation)
Abstract

Screen Tables and Substrate Scopes are information-dense figures widely used in synthetic chemistry literature, yet automated extraction of structured reaction data from them remains challenging. We introduce RxnExBench, a multimodal benchmark for fine-grained reaction-level evaluation. Built from high-impact chemistry journals, it contains 3,565 expert-annotated reactions and 2,361 molecular structures. The dataset adopts a unified schema with 15 reaction roles and 26 core fields, supporting do...

📄 Uni-Stream: A Unified Streaming Speech Language Model for Speech Synthesis and Recognition
🗓️ Published: 10/23/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32187v1
👥 Authors: Xuan Shi, Chang Zeng, Tiantian Feng, Ye Zhang (possible past Google (United States) affiliation), Jun Liu (possible past Tencent (China) affiliation), Shih-Heng Wang, Lie Lu, Shrikanth Narayanan (possible past Google (United States) affiliation)
Abstract

Unified streaming speech language models aim to support speech recognition and synthesis within a single model, enabling real-time human-computer interaction. However, jointly supporting these two directions of speech-text conversion while preserving task-specific performance remains challenging. We propose Uni-Stream, a unified streaming speech language model built on compact pretrained speech models. Uni-Stream processes interleaved text and speech in a streaming format and achieves performanc...

📄 PersonaScienceBench: Evaluating Scientific Agents with Diverse Simulated Researchers
🗓️ Published: 10/23/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32106v1
👥 Authors: Siyang Wu, Weizhi Zhang, Chen Yang (possible past Tencent (China) affiliation), Esther Xu Fei, Jorin Overwiening, Xu Pan, Jing Tang, Yixuan He, Kelvin C. Mo, Peiwen Li, Defu Cao, Xu Hu, Haixin Wang, Taoran Li, Haoming Li, Zheyuan Deng, Jingwen Zhang, Pengsong Zhang, Haichao Zhang (possible past Baidu (China) affiliation), Guangze Luo, Yi Daniel Lu, Zihuai He, Chenxi Qiu, Dianzhuo Wang, Zhejian Peng, Shushu Liang, Wenyi Lu, Yifan Wang (possible past Stanford University affiliation), Jintao Huang, Yijun Wang, Xiaomin Li, Yuexing Hao
Abstract

Scientific agents collaborate with researchers whose expertise and preferences differ, but benchmarks usually hold the collaborator fixed. We introduce PersonaScienceBench: 200 tasks from five benchmarks across four scientific domains. Simulated researchers provide context and feedback according to persona profiles, while task objectives and grading remain fixed. Agents encounter researcher preferences only through conversation. Across eighteen modelconfigurations, task performance, fact recover...

📄 SWE-Clar: Can Coding Agents Clarify Incomplete Client Requirements and Deliver Greenfield Software?
🗓️ Published: 10/22/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31854v1
👥 Authors: Jialei Li, Dingxian Wang, Xiaoyan Zhao, Yimeng Bai, Xuanyi Zhu, Yang Zhang (possible past Tsinghua University affiliation), Chao Yin, Wentao Shi, Ganesh Prabhu, Karthik Gomadam Rajagopal, Brett Levert, Darvin Yi (possible past Stanford University affiliation), Andrew Rabinovich (possible past Google (United States) affiliation), Zhao Chen
Abstract

Greenfield software development in freelance settings requires coding agents to turn incomplete client requests into working software. This makes requirement clarification essential, yet clients may be unable to provide continuous feedback over long development cycles, and receiving their answers does not guarantee correct understanding of complex requirements. These challenges motivate two benchmark design choices: clarification precedes code implementation, and its effectiveness is assessed th...

📄 Democratizing LLM Training with the Edge: Challenges, Systems, and the Road Ahead
🗓️ Published: 10/23/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32215v1
👥 Authors: Ziyue Luo, Jiaxuan Cai, Cedric Ledenmat, Srijith Nair, Fatemeh Nourzad, Rohith Krishnan, Qinhang Wu, Jifan Zhang, Sungjae Lee, Zhe Li (possible past Google (United States) affiliation), Peiwen Qiu, Siddharth Shah, Rishabh Sharma, Sundararajan Srinivasan, Yinglun Xia, Xue Zheng, Zidong Liu, Bicheng Ying, Kaushik Chowdhury, Gauri Joshi (possible past Carnegie Mellon University affiliation), Yingbin Liang, Robert Nowak, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Saurav Prakash, Balaraman Ravindran, Sanjay Shakkottai, Ness B. Shroff, Haibo Yang, Aylin Yener, Jia Liu
Abstract

The growing computational power of modern GPU data centers has let a few industrial giants train and deploy large language models (LLMs) on massive amounts of data. Yet the sheer scale of these models and their training data makes centralized development increasingly hard to sustain, and at the same time shuts out smaller institutions that hold relevant private data but lack comparable infrastructure. In this paper, we organize our positions on distributed LLM training around the pretraining and...

📄 EVOLVE: Uncertainty-Aware Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Prediction with Adaptive Prototype Memories
🗓️ Published: 10/23/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32189v1
👥 Authors: Jianxin Jin, Kai Zhao, Shiyan Hu, Yang Shu, Peng Chen (possible past Tencent (China) affiliation), Meng Wang (possible past Google (United States) affiliation), Zhongwen Rao, Yijie Li, Jing Wang (possible past Google (United States) affiliation), Bin Yang, Chenjuan Guo
Abstract

Unsupervised multivariate time series anomaly prediction (AP) aims to estimate future anomaly risks from current observations, providing early-warning signals for proactive intervention and maintenance in complex systems. Existing unsupervised AP methods follow a perturbation-based paradigm, where predefined or random perturbations are injected into historical windows to simulate abnormal future evolution. However, these methods share perturbations across different variables and contexts, and le...

📄 SyncPro: Synchronous Reasoning and Responding for Proactive Streaming Video Understanding
🗓️ Published: 10/23/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32132v1
👥 Authors: Xueyun Tian, Bingbing Xu, Jiaming Liu (possible past Baidu (China) affiliation), Jinpeng Yu, Yang Shi, Yu Zhao (possible past Tencent (China) affiliation), Ruihua Huang, Yuanzhuo Wang, Huawei Shen
Abstract

Proactive streaming video understanding requires assistants to track unfolding events and respond when a user's requested condition is met. To make these decisions, assistants must accumulate relevant evidence and reassess response conditions as new observations arrive. Existing work offers complementary capabilities for this process: proactive video assistants learn when to respond, while streaming video reasoning methods generate scheduled intermediate text to organize observations and support...

📄 Rewriting Scaling Laws for Synthetic Data with Compute and Data Constraints
🗓️ Published: 10/22/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31867v1
👥 Authors: Nicholas Roberts, Ahmed Ahmed, Suhas Kotha, Percy Liang (possible past Stanford University affiliation), Yu Wang (possible past Tsinghua University affiliation), Alex Renda, Nitya Mani
Abstract

Synthetic rewrites, where a language model rewrites a natural document e.g. into a target style, are now a standard ingredient of pretraining corpora. However, critical aspects of their use remain poorly understood, such as how much compute should be spent rewriting training data and whether a model trained on rewrites can outperform the rewriter. We study these two questions by proposing a rewriting scaling law that predicts loss from model size, training tokens, the fraction of training tokens...

📄 A Fix for Softmax and Cross-Entropy
🗓️ Published: 10/22/2026
🔗 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31642v1
👥 Authors: Jonathan T. Barron (possible past Google (United States) affiliation), Dan Gnanapragasam (possible past Google (United States) affiliation), Michael Tschannen (possible past Google (United States) affiliation)
Abstract

Standard implementations of softmax, log-softmax, and cross-entropy have two numerical bugs. The first bug, Softmax Collapse, rounds the target logit's gradient to zero if that one logit is much larger than the others, resulting in gradients that no longer sum to zero. The second bug, Softmax Cancellation, occurs when student logits are close to teacher logits, and produces non-zero gradients even when the student and teacher logits are equal. We present simple implementations of log-softmax, so...

*Notable papers are those with at least two authors from a "big" AI/ML lab.